“Selected Salvos 2” is the second Fun&Freedom Book by Garry Reed, the self-proclaimed Loose Cannon Libertarian. One reviewer said his writing bordered on H.L. Mencken and Groucho Marx. My opinion is that it’s more more akin to an edgy and irreverent hybridization of Harry Browne and P.J. O’Rourke.
“Selected Salvos 2” is similar to his first self-published book, strangely enough called “Selected Salvos from the Loose Cannon Libertarian.” It is another anthology of his essays, opinion pieces, rantings and assorted writings. Most have been published online on his website Loose Cannon Libertarian and under his alter egos, the Libertarian News Examiner and the Dallas Libertarian Examiner.
Most Libertarians know about the Austrian School of Economics and the Keynesian School of Economics. Reed believes in the “Playboy School of Economics,” and claims bragging rights for creating the phrase “Playboynomics,” the theme for this collection.
“Having seen the people of all other nations bowed down to the earth under the wars and prodigalities of their rulers, I have cherished their opposites, peace, economy, and riddance of public debt, believing that these were the high road to public as well as private prosperity and happiness.”– Thomas Jefferson
BURNET, Texas (Oct. 15) – War breeds war. That is all it can do. War does nothing but devour valuable resources and destroy precious lives for the sole purpose of perpetuating itself. As Randolph Bourne wrote, “War is the health of the State.” War is a mechanism used by the ruling elites of the State to coerce and control the people, so it becomes essential that whenever one war is complete, another is instigated elsewhere so that the mechanism keeps running.
Gov. Beverly Perdue should have vetoed a bill that eliminated financial advantages municipalities had in setting up broadband service, a Libertarian Party of North Carolina spokesman said Friday.
“The governor should have vetoed this blatant intrusion into the free market and city business,” said Matt Drew, state party chair. While Libertarians do not believe municipalities should be in the business of providing broadband service, he said this bill does not create a “level-playing field” for private competition as supporters claim.
“The playing field is already tilted heavily, in the other direction — in favor of big service providers such as Time Warner Cable,” Drew said. “Supporters of this bill want to create a ‘faux market’ rather than a free market.”
“In a faux market, laws and regulations are written by and lobbied for by large incumbent corporations, with the intent of suppressing competition and protecting their market position,” Drew explained. “This bill is intended to protect these large incumbent service providers from city-owned network competition, closing a previously unnoticed gap in their market position defenses.”